Too early to discuss a new product?

[monteluna]

PIPT is great and there’s a lot to be said about the design around the 8 blue chips, but is it too early to consider a new Power Pool for a riskier tranche? I noticed in the UI that there’s components for multiple Pools. How easy is it to make Power Pool 2 with some riskier tokens, and maybe BTC and ETH to help diversify the pool?

With the recent discussion of Sushi and Yearn, I think Sushi might be a fair game. Some other tokens that come to mind are Curve, Balancer, Augur. It seems like prices of these riskier DeFi assets are anti-correlated with Bitcoin and Ether, so maybe including those in the pot as well would be helpful.

Any thoughts on this?

[Sergey]

Understand your reasoning, but I believe we should focus on indexes and consider PIPT (or CVP) / X asset types of pools as only the mean to get liquidity into the indexes.

Thus imo it is reasonable only to consider CVP/ETH, PIPT/USDC, PIPT/ETH pools and pay rewards to LP of this pools coz they help to bring more funds into the indexes

Please see here in @Alan’s proposal

Proposal 13: Re-Establish PIPT/USDC Pool on Uniswap

Summary: I propose the PowerPool Project offer an incentive for those that provide liquidity to a PIPT/USDC Uniswap Pool. PIPT is the trading token for the PowerPool Index which consists of 8 Major DeFi Projects. The rewards for users funding liquidity to this pool would be 250K CVP per month supplied by the PowerPool Treasury. Any CVP Rewards would be vested over 10 weeks. The following benefits should be achieved by passing this proposal; 1 - additional exposurer for the Token to Users who ar…