Currently there is an active proposal called “Rewards vesting structure changes for all YETI pools” that is being voted on by the community. Upon seeing this proposal it seems clear to me the intention behind this proposal was just to obtain tokens even faster to dilute the market unnecessary (atleast that’s how it appears to me). It is a poorly written proposal with no justification whatsoever.
My issue is mostly not even with all this poor quality. It is mostly that this proposal was not even discussed in this forum to begin. Instead it seems to me that it just seems to have “appeared” as an active proposal. Past proposals have gone through a community discussion before voting started. This has many benefits.
It feels like the creator/funder of this proposal wanted to skip all obstacles and get it passed as quickly as possible for their own benefit.
So basically what I am saying is, if the community feels it is appropriate and worthwhile and you all agree, is it possible to make it so that you can only submit a proposal for voting that has been on the forum for minimum of e.g 2 days?
As we have seen in the past, discussion gives fhe community a better sense of how a proposal affects the project. Especially new members who find community discussions helpful to understand the implications of a proposal. So making it mandatory seems beneficial.
Keen to hear your thoughts.
Should the pre voting discussion of every future proposal be mandatory? Is it possible?